the hispanic challenge

0

oh and don’t forget the ‘Hispanic Challenge’ - our loving kind and very thoughtful friend mr. huntington’s other controversial book, written after the C of C.


” The persistent inflow of Hispanic immigrants threatens to divide the United States into two peoples, two cultures, and two languages. Unlike past immigrant groups, Mexicans and other Latinos have not assimilated into mainstream U.S. culture, forming instead their own political and linguistic enclaves—from Los Angeles to Miami—and rejecting the Anglo-Protestant values that built the American dream. The United States ignores this challenge at its peril.”

the good thing about this book is that display’s clearly mr. huntington’s biases and frankly his rather fascist tendencies. ( not that wasn’t apparent to any clear thinker who read the clash of civilizations - but there you go - the problem with that book was really it fed lot’s of people’s prejudices- thats really why it was so popular, if we’re going to be brutally honest )

p.s. the link takes you to the article in ForeignPolicy magazine from March 2004. you know how our friend writes articles and then turns them into books. really you do have to give him credit on his money-making capabilities.

in any case the other amusing thing is mr. huntington clearly doesn’t actually know any history. and frankly, he’s a bit obsessed with the ‘founding fathers’. anyway even if he was right about america’s ‘founders and settlers’ - who gives a shit anymore? how can it be democratic for him to say –oh ye young ones, we must stick to tradition and what the founding fathers wanted. damn - they arent around anymore, and if you want to pretend you live in a democratic country - then you’re gonna have to deal with who’s there, not with who’s dead. come out of the mausoleum and check out the changes.

fundamentally what it comes down to- if you don’t like change you’re fucked. you can try and make everything static - but frankly it ain’t static. the world isnt static, cultures arent static, they’ve all been changing and mixing even if people like to pretend they live in non-permeable rigidly bounded boxes which have been around forever.

thinking again..clash of civilizations?

0

now given the fact that i’ve gone on about this stuff below - i reckon its not long before some crazed International Relations or Government Studies -type person comes along and quotes the Clash of Civilizations thesis at me. well to pre-empt that ( ha ha) let me just say that my point was not about such and such a country setting out to cause trouble. its highly likely that someone will come along and think - ah yes - what i read in that Huntington’s book - about the balance of power and clash of civilizations - yes that’s what its about. no it bloody well isn’t. its precisely the opposite. Let me say very clearly here and now Samuel P. Huntington’s thesis is a lot of bollocks. i shall explain in suitable academic detail very soon.

in the meantime this is an article that is certainly worth reading - Edward W. Said on the clash of ignorance.

so much for the Harvard Academy of International and Area Studies. how sad that an academic institution should be so influenced by inside- the- box -patriotism. And also in tandem - people at academic institutions worldwide have been forced to listen to silly people who ought to have thought for themselves independently- quoting Huntington. i cannot say strongly enough how much damage this man has done.

in the meantime please feel free to blast me with any invective.

thinking outside the box

0

yeah thats pretty fucking difficult. and given the fact that society is so damn eager to brainwash us all its no bloody wonder.

first of all lets take a look at this situation we find ourselves in. boxed in by the nation-state. and to a lot of people that is the normal unit of organization - so they think a lot of people think -okay- whatever i want to do or not do - they sort of invest a certain amount of expectation in their nation-state - i.e. they get tied up with it. now you tend to see this sort of thing happening more in certain countries..you can sort of see why as well. ok the USA takes itself as a nation-state very seriously - and as a result its quite difficult for its citizens and denizens to not be influenced by that rhetoric of national greatness and in terms of success and progress measured nationally.

india is another one ( don’t worry - there are a lot others ..you aren’t alone ;-)) - an up- and- coming potentially incredibly powerful in conventional international relations paradigm. so its not surprising when you meet Indians ( esp. the nri types..) that often any talk of ideas or progress tends to be very much bound up with the nation - and a nationalistic mindset which may soon parallel that of the US.

and you may say - so whats wrong with that. nothing necessarily - except you can see that situation possibly resulting in just a boring and unpleasant re-run of mistakes already made - yeah a constant going back to square one.

we need a paradigm shift. being obsessed with aspirations of national greatness is not the point. the point isnt shall we opt out of UN and other structures ( which may not be working) aimed at some sort of dialogue and collaboration. the point is again - i repeat - always collaboration - not necessarily within the box - i.e. unit of nation-state..but at any level.. but certainly not competition - within or without the box.

there you go. sorry to have to repeat this all but if you look and listen carefully to most inane messages - they are constantly repeated. if i want people to start thinking about the boxes we inhabit and need to come out of, then i better start repeating too.

the world

0

i hear a lot of people from certain countries who seem to have a similar argument with regards to the UN- that why do they need it, they ought to opt out etc. etc. ( india and the USA) now the UN sure ain’t an efficient institution. hell there aren’t many efficient institutions around. ( good instititutions are a damned difficult thing to sort out - not least because loads of people seem to overlook the fact that they actually need work and thinking about)

seriously though - the UN isn’t the problem - its the symptom. yes it isn’t much of a useful institution but that’s because of the problems of the world - it reflects us. people don’t like the UN cos they don’t want to admit the world is unequal and rubbish. and they expect somehow that without changing their views somehow the UN is automatically going to be the wonderful representative organization its meant to be. and its not because some countries are ‘terrorist’ and others are peace-loving - that’s bollocks. all countries are capable of behaving in the same war-like obscene way - what are standing armies for otherwise?

its the system of organizing ourself into hostile nations-states that is the fundamental problem. well one of the fundamental problems. one of the others is that a lot of narrow-minded people have been influenced by this and want to keep it that way. which makes change hard.

need to think outside the box.

collaboration NOT competition.

sidenote

0

as a sidenote to the comment below - why is everyone so obsessed with competition and competitiveness? I mean really - we are so weighed down with the framework of go-go-go, get-it! and competition appears to be inherent in that. so many people seem to think that if we don’t encourage competitive behaviour, people would be ‘lazy’.

so as a result we have a lot of unhappy people - who are stressed about their grades, whether they can go faster at the gym than other people, whether they are happier than other people, whether they have better blogs..blah blah the list goes on.

you can opt in or opt out. or at least choose to reduce the no. of things you worry about in this way.

i say to the competitive types: leave me alone, i ain’t playing your game.

how to be idle

3

The Idler

latest issue of The Idler magazine.

read the fantastic book ” how to be idle” by tom hodgkinson, speaking out against the frenetic pace of modern life.

Lao Tzu would have been pleased.

and what is heckling?

0

“To try to embarrass and annoy (someone speaking or performing in public) by questions, gibes, or objections; badger”

surely this term is being used incorrectly.

well it sounds to me like the whole point of politicians speaking in public is to be “cross-examined”. now obviously it suits the establishment to refer to comments that they don’t like - as heckling. actually anyone who is not prepared to be cross-examined ought not to be on a public stage. fuck off. next time i give some speech or other and i dont like what someone says to me i will cry -and say - ooh dear, im being **heckled** oh please oh won’t some big beefy man throw this person out- i’m only little and i can’t deal with it..sob sob

ha ha.

now some very strange person on the BBC ‘have your say forum’ on the latest Labour debacle( by the way - the link is to an article by the China Daily - hee hee) - has this to say:

” I don’t see the point. Heckling is very annoying. It is not the right way to object or accept a point. The Prime Minister’s apology could lead to subsequent poor comportment in the House of Commons - a great advocate of democracy. Barah Nicoline Yinyuy, Bamenda, Cameroon”

dear me - you don’t see the point? ah yes we should let our party leaders say what they like - why bother having a party conference then. just say this is how it is if you dont like it fuck off.

at any rate, at least most of the other comments on this forum seemed to indicate some modicum of common sense. though there are the usual weirdo’s. who are these people!?

- take a look at this one -

“Maybe there’s a right time and place to heckle. If he doesn’t agree with his party’s policies then maybe he should think about joining another party. Chris, Birmingham, UK” -

yeah buddy Chris - i think the poor fellow thought if he wanted to ask questions then the party conference is the place to do it - confer- you know. the point is that if you think that - if you dont agree with something then join another party - why - you’d never :

a) find the party to join ( which is why so many of us aren’t in one)

and b) you’d always have to chop and change when you disagreed, and you weren’t allowed to register ‘dissent’ - why? oh because that would be heckling - which is not done in polite society surely!!

doesn’t this all boil down to the same old bloody question - what the hell is democracy about if we ( whatever ‘group’/ ‘party’/ ‘nation’ ) think that the group’s leadership has one idea and no-one can challenge that. !!!!

and this one –oooh:

“It was totally right for Wolfgang to be ejected. He is typical of the old lefty image New Labour want to get rid of. He has no place in a modern party like ours and I only wish the stewards had chucked out the rest of them. Better still, we should send them off to Iraq to see how they would solve the situation. Jeff Graves, Bromley, England”.

and then - my my - does anyone know this person??why dont they have a “party no-one else can join”.

its democracy within a group that’s so overlooked - people only think of democracy in the context of a nation-state. how stupid is that. like a nation-state ain’t a ‘group’.

why hasnt the BBC got any blogs?

3

why indeed? what they seem to encourage on the bbc website are these “Have your say” forums - at the end of a news article - which really seems to be aimed at encouraging the most right-wing, dictatorial and incredibly prejudiced fuck-wits of the world to write in. Now i may be wrong of course, and they just happen to publish whatever anyone writes in - but its not as simple as that - as its moderated - and i’ve tried soo many times to get a comment in - but failed apart from one time. So obviously, whoever the moderator is - decides. fine - but they still jolly well ought to have some proper blogs - like the Guardian does - lots of lovely blogs - where we can all come along and say what we think - and it would be easier to see actually are all the people who comment on those forums a bunch of right-wing nutters or if its just the moderators who like to spice up the reading with a lot of invective.

and if the BBC has got some blogs - well they need to then highlight them clearly to us poor people. i’ve just been searching and searching and all i can find is other people saying much the same thing. now the only thing i’ve just found is something called Ouch! which is part of the BBC site - and has a weblog as part of it. thats great - and they’re looking for guest bloggers - good - but what about BBC news blogs - surely they’d be really popular. just think about the kind of raging debates ( and no doubt some flame wars..he heh) we could have with these psychos that live in the ‘have your say’ forums.

this gets even better. perseverance pays off - found out about the Comedy Blog - but it takes ages to see if they let us post comments or not ( on first sight it appears not to be the case) but again rooting around, i found a page where it says - hey send us your comments - but! it looks unfortunately very much like where they say on those forums - send us your comments and we’ll publish the best - what the fuck is this - some kind of writing competition??? –> ” Thank you for your comments. The BBC reserves the right to modify any messages before appearing on this web page.” not very friendly is it?

i think the BBC needs to wake up and stop thinking old broadcast media and fully embrace the interactive age they go on about. mind you, im not anti-bbc or anything ( if you might think that from the tone of my comments!) its just frustrating when they insist on this old-fashioned monolithic organization -type stuff.

wake up

a good bookshop

2

uniteddiversity is an open co-operative dedicated to making sustainable living easy, improving quality of life and reducing ecological footprint. this is their online sustainable living shop and has some fantastic books on offer. take a look see and it may change your life.

so many people out there are all thinking - yah i wanna make a difference. but its hard to know exactly how. that’s the most difficult bit- a good start is to see what’s out there already and read as much as you can!

Other events this weekend

1

Amnesty International - fundraiser this saturday 1st October

“DJs Shakti, Principal, and Tom Lloyd on the decks, Comedy and MCing from Birmingham’s Craig Deeley. Conjuring and magic from Champagne Bobby and and THREE live bands: Lofi Americana from The Sways, Blondie-esque girl pop from the Bright Lights, and maniac Rockabilly stray-cats-meets-primal -scream rock n roll from Ludes (fresh from their appearance at TDK cross central festival).

Water Rats Theatre, 328 Gray’s Inn Road. 7.30 p.m. - 2.00 a.m. £10. All proceeds to Amnesty

courtesy of Flora @ Metroblogging London

——–

Synergy event @ LSE : sunday 2nd october

“This coming Sunday also sees the launch of the Synergy Sunday, a more chilled-out equivalent of The Synergy Project, held at the London School of Economics on Houghton Street.”

4-11pm £7

featuring :

Kakatsitsi, Master Drummers from Ghana, traditional set /’Make Poverty History - Happening or Not ?”- A panel discussion with speakers from leading members of the coalition. /Indymedia films - grassroots films and documentaries/ Ambient, World, Reggae and Trance music from DJs. Pavi (Alchemy Records/UK) /Christian Davies (IDSpiral)/Pete Ardron/Mudra/Steve Indigenous /

and performances by : Wemoonspiral - a magical journey in shadow puppetry /Sandra - visionary dance performance/Inside us All - Conscious Visuals /African Drum Workshop by Kakatsitsi - drums provided /United Diversity Sustainable Living Info Shop/Paradox - philosophical and political poetry. /Zen Art Deco by ID Spiral/ Mali Mudcloth, Ghanaian Tie-Dye, Masks and Statues.

 Page 23 of 27  « First  ... « 21  22  23  24  25 » ...  Last » 

Archives

RSS delicious