Category Archives: Crisis of Religion

Some more strange Hadiths?

70

I”ve been doing some more reading - one of my thoughts was to create a section on the sidebar with resources/writings on religion I have used and perused along the way, should others want to have a look through. A lot of this recent thinking was kicked off by a post on Pickled Politics titled Feminism and Islam, back in February -which really revived a bit of my old militant feminist spirit - and got me thinking about the problems of religion again. (I found some really interesting stuff on Islamic feminism and related thinking & isms -along the way, which i thought was very pertinent from the point of view of religious reform)
Now some of the commentary out there on religion is likely to be “biased” and I think it would be pretty obvious that some are what a some people would consider “islamophobic”, etc. and some of it is clearly biased on the “religious” side, so on and so forth.

More reading into what are the primary sources, is probably a good idea, and what i”ve been doing a lot of this recently. I thought i”d spend more time with the Hadiths - mainly Sahih Muslim and Bukhari from the very useful USC MSA Compendium of Muslim Texts, (and in all good time, of course, the Quran. ) Very interesting reading to say the least! I can”t imagine if one went to a class on Islam, or dawah classes: how would the teachers get past questions, queries etc. I suppose out of those of us born Muslim - most are probably not going to get the nerve up to ask any smarmy questions.

A lot of the tales which appear to be quite superstitious. From a social and cultural history perspective - this is all very interesting for me, and rather revealing.

Some tidbits to share:

Sahih Bukhari :Volume 4, Book 55, Number 545: Um Salama said, “Um Salaim said, “O Allah”s Apostle! Allah does not refrain from saying the truth! Is it obligatory for a woman to take a bath after she gets nocturnal discharge?” He said, “Yes, if she notices the water (i.e. discharge).” Um Salama smiled and said, “Does a woman get discharge?” Allah”s Apostle said. “Then why does a child resemble (its mother)?”

Volume 4, Book 55, Number 546:Narrated Anas: When “Abdullah bin Salam heard the arrival of the Prophet at Medina, he came to him and said, “I am going to ask you about three things which nobody knows except a prophet: What is the first portent of the Hour? What will be the first meal taken by the people of Paradise? Why does a child resemble its father, and why does it resemble its maternal uncle” Allah”s Apostle said, “Gabriel has just now told me of their answers.” “Abdullah said, “He (i.e. Gabriel), from amongst all the angels, is the enemy of the Jews.” Allah”s Apostle said, “The first portent of the Hour will be a fire that will bring together the people from the east to the west; the first meal of the people of Paradise will be Extra-lobe (caudate lobe) of fish-liver. As for the resemblance of the child to its parents: If a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets discharge first, the child will resemble the father, and if the woman gets discharge first, the child will resemble her.” On that “Abdullah bin Salam said, “I testify that you are the Apostle of Allah.” “Abdullah bin Salam further said, “O Allah”s Apostle! The Jews are liars, and if they should come to know about my conversion to Islam before you ask them (about me), they would tell a lie about me.” The Jews came to Allah”s Apostle and “Abdullah went inside the house. Allah”s Apostle asked (the Jews), “What kind of man is “Abdullah bin Salam amongst you?” They replied, “He is the most learned person amongst us, and the best amongst us, and the son of the best amongst us.” Allah”s Apostle said, “What do you think if he embraces Islam (will you do as he does)?” The Jews said, “May Allah save him from it.” Then “Abdullah bin Salam came out in front of them saying, “I testify that None has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is the Apostle of Allah.” Thereupon they said, “He is the evilest among us, and the son of the evilest amongst us,” and continued talking badly of him. Volume 4, Book 55, Number 552: Allah”s Apostle said, “Whenever a person is murdered unjustly, there is a share from the burden of the crime on the first son of Adam for he was the first to start the tradition of murdering.”

Hmm - a bit original sin-y that last bit? and what”s with this Gabriel is the enemy of the Jews, ahem! that sounds like maybe this is where some of the more dangerous thinkers get their funny ideas from?

On a more positive note ( yep!) I always think it”s a good idea to find out what others are thinking - and to not always focus in on the negative impressions out there - but see what positive ideas/thoughts etc. religious texts are inspiring in others. A new initiative ( and a great one i think - not too many others out there are doing the same) is the Quran Blog -which is a collaborative blogger effort, and the idea is that the writers share a particular verse that they have been reading, and their thoughts and insights and interpretations. I”m looking forward to reading more entries and posts - i”m hoping it will help me in being a bit more clear/reflexive about my own reactions to the same verses etc. so on and so forth. In any case, it is something to see this kind of thinking being documented.

On troubling Hadiths

375

A few thoughts on hadiths and religion in general:

I had a difficult relationship with religion while I was growing up. As a child, I used to be a voracious reader and stumbled upon lots of things, including the Hadith collection my parents had. Now there was one particular Hadith that I read when i was about 10 - which was a real shock to the system. I cannot emphasize how shocking - and how much impact it had - but in any case, it”s something that troubled me for a long long time. Frankly I couldn”t believe it. And it wasn”t something you could speak about to people - a) it was extremely indecent or so I felt as a child ( and the horror of having found it in a Hadith collection, can you imagine) and b) not the sort of thing you can broach to “religious” people very easily - and plus the whole ” forbidden areas of thinking” thing. I felt terribly alone - had anyone else read this stuff? what did they think about it if they had? no answers for a long time.

Now fast forward to the days where you can look up anything on the net -hooray ! and ask all sorts of people questions on the internet and generally find out more about what”s going on in other people”s heads. I”ve had some discussions about this hadith - but not too many -and then I tracked it down just to be sure i hadn”t dreamed it up, thanks to the USC MSa Compendium of Muslim texts which is searchable and a handy resource.

And of course as a child I had no idea about sex slavery or concubinage (whatever you want to call it) - or that islamic fiqh had regulated the conditions of slavery. of course the war booty thing ties in with the “taking women ransom” but I”d never heard such justifications back then. If i had, i”m sure my feelings at the time of the Iraq invasion would have been even more complicated. {and plus all the stories you hear from relatives in bangladesh about the pakistani soldiers raping women in the war} These sorts of things are everywhere, but you don”t expect to read about them in compilations of “religious texts”. Why doesn”t it bother more people that”s what I wanted to know, what I still want to know, or how it can be “rationalised”. Some people are thinking about these knotty issues, but most people will brush them under the carpet. I daresay that is the natural thing to do - avoid controversy.

The Hadith in question is taken from Sahih Muslim, Book 8 which is the The Book of Marriage” (Kitab Al-Nikah)

Chapter 22: AL AZL (INCOMPLETE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE): COITUS INTERRUPTUS

Book 008, Number 3371:

“Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa”id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa”id, did you hear Allah”s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-”azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah”s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi”l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing “azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah”s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah”s Mes- senger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

So that”s pretty much what rocked my boat: I don”t know what people manage to rationalize as adults but as a child that was pretty damn shocking to me, particularly given what I was told by my Mother about the “morals of sexuality in Islam”.

The next few narrations in Sahih Muslim which touch on this as well:

Book 008, Number 3372: A hadith like this has been narrated on the authority of Habban with the same chain of transmitters (but with this alteration) that he said:” Allah has ordained whom he has to create until the Day of judgment.” Book 008, Number 3373: Abu Sa”id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported: We took women captives, and we wanted to do “azl with them. We then asked Allah”s Messen- ger (may peace be upon him) about it, and he said to us: Verily you do it, verily you do it, verily you do it, but the soul which has to be born until the Day of judgment must be born. Book 008, Number 3381: Abu Sa”id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah”s Messenger (may peace be upon him) was asked about “azl, whereupon he said: The child does not come from all the liquid (semen) and when Allah intends to create anything nothing can prevent it (from coming into existence). Book 008, Number 3377: Abu Sa”id al-Khudri (Allah be pleased with him) reported that mention was made of “azl in the presence of Allah”s Apostle (may peace be upon him) whereupon he said: Why do you practise it? They said: There is a man whose wife has to suckle the child, and if that person has a sexual intercourse with her (she may conceive) which he does not like, and there is another person who has a slave-girl and he has a sexual intercourse with her, but he does not like her to have conception so that she may not become Umm Walad, whereupon he (the Holy Prophet) said: There is no harm if you do not do that, for that (the birth of the child) is something pre- ordained. Ibn “Aun said: I made a mention of this hadith to Hasan, and he said: By Allah, (it seems) as if there is upbraiding in it (for “azl).”

Apparently the reason they seem to talk about this “al-azl” thing so much is all tied up with the permissibility of contraception, or so it seems. So that”s what the men were bothered about: contraception - not - oh is it okay if i just have a quickie with this woman captive/slave girl here? and personally what i found the most shocking was that the Prophet was amongst them at the time - so what was he doing there while these men were “enjoying” the captive women? I really had a lot of trouble with this one - once I”d read that I felt really resentful when as a teenager - time and time again- people would say “well we are all very moral people. we do not believe in boyfriends or girlfriends”. Sure aunties and uncles..i wanted to say..how do you explain this stuff then? {but of course good asian girls are not mean to answer back to the “community” are they now, oh no}
Wholesome reading isn”t it. I can”t understand personally when you have lurid tales like these why anyone is bothered about cartoons. It seems to me if there is anything that would defame the character of a Holy Prophet then Hadiths like this one are the culprit. Would I choose to accept this as “religious tradition” - well no of course not. If this is meant to be true then I can”t say honestly that I am impressed at all.
A note on inauthentic and authentic hadiths: These Hadiths are from the Sahih Muslim collection. For a long time I was vaguely aware that there were “weak”" hadiths around - basically Hadiths that were “questionable” and didn”t have a reliable “chain” of narration. So for a while I assumed that this creepy stuff about coitus interruptus with captive women would surely fall into the “questionable” camp, oh no - it turned out to be in Sahih Muslim - which according to Sunni tradition after Sahih Bukharis meant to be the two most reliable ones! ( don”t take my word for it - read the wikipedia links below). Well as far as I know anyway - i”d love it if someone came along and said, actually this stuff is bollocks too. Apparently Shias dismiss Sahih Muslim as inauthentic - I wonder why?
“A Sahih hadith is the one which has a continuous isnad, made up of reporters of trustworthy memory from similar authorities, and which is found to be free from any irregularities (i.e. in the text) or defects (i.e. in the isnad)”

wikipedia tells us that:

Muhammad”s sayings and deeds are called sunnah and are transmitted through hadith. Imam Muslim (full name Abul Husain Muslim bin al-Hajjaj al-Nisapuri) was born in 202 A.H. and died in 261 A.H. He traveled widely to gather his collection of ahadith, including to Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Egypt. Out of 300,000 ahadith which he evaluated, only 4,000 approximately were extracted for inclusion into his collection based on stringent acceptance criteria. Each report in his collection was checked for compatibility with the Qur”an, and the veracity of the chain of reporters had to be painstakingly established. Muslim was a student of Bukhari and Ahmad ibn Hanbal.

It is important to realize, however, that Imam Muslim never claimed to collect all authentic traditions. He tried to collect only traditions that all Muslims should agree on its accuracy. There are other scholars who worked as Muslim did and collected other authentic reports. After Sahih Bukhari, this is the most authentic hadith collection in the Sunni perspective.

According to Munziri, there are a total of 2200 hadiths (with no repetition) in Sahih Muslim. This would bring the total of Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim to 3000 hadiths. According to most Hadith scholars[1], there are 1400 authentic hadiths that are reported in other books (mainly the Six major Hadith collections).

hadith

Eye on Backbiting Muslims

23

Yes indeed. Funny title I know - but instead of being fast asleep here i am browsing the net which i haven”t had a chance to do in a while. i visited a very strange blog which i haven”t seen in ages but caught my attention a while back - eye on gay muslims - and boy are they a bunch of whiners. I mean they”re pleased some one got fired for “inappropriate” views on sexual orientation - a Dr. Ghazala Anwar. The objection appears to be that Dr. Anwar wasn”t interpreting her religion in a rigid enough fashion, and being a scholar - might encourage other people to think that her ideas were somehow valid. Apparently the fuss being about that someone who has been open about their views on homosexuality ( shock! horror! someone at ease with themselves ..oh my GAWD) could be appointed as a Professor in Islamic Jursiprudence. Which some viewed as ironic. So instead of having some debate.. right, let”s fire this crazy lady, and be done with. We wouldn”t want to question things with an open mind now would we?

“Puh-leese - they do seem rather a mean lot of people. ( call themselves compassionate as well ) their main aim in life seems to be self-denial ( good for you - if that”s what you want) and trying to enforce the same on everyone else. oops no - not quite - just anyone else who is gay ( oops excuse me - SSA -same sex orientation rather) should do the same. should anyone try to reconcile their religion and their sexual orientation - oh dear! - woe betide them - the eye of eye on gay muslims will be on them, pouring their wrath on them for daring to have a personal individual interpretation of religious beliefs. ooh dearie me..

really it”s people like this lot that make dogma what it is. they seem to forget every person has agency, and the right to individual interpretation, seeing as they”re the ones who”re accountable for their own actions.

anyhow, ignoring this lot * apart from providing me with the occasional entertainment* and they very kindly have my name up in lights on their website to - as a response to this post - thanks for that guys! I am flattered.

The wider issue is one of course of religious dogma and potential reform of said dogma. How is that going to happen when people are always sitting at the sidelines, hissing at people who”re brave enough to say i want to think for myself? Well it must be said that at least hissing at them is perfectly acceptable - free speech and all that - at least it”s not a fatwa. Right? It could be a lot worse, and it often is.

And a serious part of the problem with any sort of open intellectual discussion - to do with to do with “religion” - is this polarization you are either with us, or against us. and if you”re not a 100% with us and you”re questioning, you either keep it very quiet, or you”re feeding the “Other”. Well it”s not very helpful, but i”m not going to keep quiet because im supposed to “toe the party line” . it”s very unfortunate people should try and separate points of view and opinion which is clearly on some kind of continuum, into separate, discrete, clearly defined camps, and imply that any questioning results one in being “placed” into the other camp. Very unfortunate and it”s contributed to the difficulty religion as a whole finds itself in nowadays.
if you”re not convinced enough of the unpalatable aspects (whatever they may and naturally they will vary from one individual to another) you are still supposed to subscribe to wholeheartedly - instead of just being able to take what positives you may find spiritually - one is exhorted to either deal with everything, or nothing. turned into some sort of apostate. Taking sides - it”s depressing, and imposed externally by various people on various sides. As far as I can see, there are some atheists who are just as dogmatic as some who have “faith” - personally I would like to be more “convinced” - what a luxury. The way I see it though, and as some wise people have pointed out to me, we”re all on a journey. most of us are on a journey, and haven”t “arrived” but are looking. how are you going to “look” meaninfully if you”re not allowed to express what you”re thinking along the way? that”s would correspond to a fixed way of interpreting religion, rather than a dynamic way - which uses the journey as a metaphor. Some of us have more to discover than others, and if we can”t express ourselves along the way, well fat lot of good it is. in my opinion, these are the negative implications of “organized religion” : versus some sort of individualistic approach to ethics and self-determination. ( and this isn”t about Islam particularly, in my opinion, it”s organized religions in general. Personally I can”t see how the dynamics end up being any different to that of any patriotic group, tribe, or nation-state. I”ve been doing some thinking recently and have come to realize that the objections i”ve had to what religious feeding I”ve received have been mostly on anarchist principles.

Archives

RSS delicious