Category Archives: Bangladesh

Travelogue

15

I have been meaning to write a lot of things over the last few years..but the procrastinator that i am ( i did say so..) I somehow have not gotten around to any of it. Still, its never to late to say never - ( which is why i have a 7 year to do list much to the disgust of some..) and this blog is called the “past present and future..” so no reason why material from the past can”t be brought to light.

Bengal is a part of the world that I have definitely done the least amount of travelling in, ironically - it is where I am from. I am perhaps naturally fascinated by it and its history, there is so much to absorb. I was in Bangladesh over this last xmas/new years and for the first time, actually managed to do some travelling - to Chittagong - where i have never been ever, and to St. Martin”s Island -which was till January - for me, a mythical place.. the anecdotes definitely need turning into some form of travel journal. It”"s not an easy country to travel around, i can understand my parent”s objections, but i thought dammit, if i don”t do it now it will never happen, i can”t just sit tamely in dhaka every time i visit ( or in the tamer parts of dhaka..) in the end, apart from a few mishaps and a hell of a lot of curiosity + interference, and paranoia and constant calls from the folks {really!} it was all fine and good. ( i am not an idiot after all.. + just because my travelling companion, my dear husband - is a “phoreigner” didn”t mean we were like a blind + deaf person combination that everyone made out we would be!)

A few photographs to start the notebook..one of the interesting places - in Old Dhaka that i had managed to sneak a peek into in the past, and visited again on this trip - is the palace, on the bank of the buriganga {old ganges} river of the nawabs of dhaka who lived in it from the nineteenth century onwards. I shall write more about it later, it is currently a museum - full of artefacts of empire and rulers and relics of a bygone age - and a popular destination for “outings” - so past meets present. Sadarghat - is the historic “ghat” -(wharf) - and it is a fascinating place with no doubt fascinating tales. There is something about old dhaka (purano dhaka) that fascinates me..perhaps because it shows up the distinction between what was, and what is becoming. And there is something about the fabric of the old town, the architectural details and the old houses and mosques, that evokes for me -the bygone era , i know - i can”t help it, i do find the past fascinating in a strange sort of way. A glimpse into another world..

ahsan manzil

ahsan 2

No to Military Rule and no to media censorship!

1

tasneem khalil

well after all that drama, tasneem was released around 24 hours of his arrest…thank goodness! questions still remain unanswered and clearly it was a close shave..will the next journalist/critic of power be so lucky? the whole issue of media censorship can”t be ignored and the big thing of course is about military taking over power. there is good coverage on this …please check out Mash and Rezwan.. and I will update with links to other bloggers covering this very important topic.

BREAKING NEWS: Tasneem Khalil arrested by Military Police in Bangladesh

9

via Pickled Politics ( thanks Sunny!)

please help tasneem
“Prominent journalist and fellow blogger Tasneem Khalil has been arrested by the military police in Bangladesh, a serious attack on press freedom in the country.

An editor and outspoken journalist for the English daily newspaper Daily Star, he also worked for CNN and Human Rights Watch in the country. Of late he has been documenting the military’s attempts to take over Bangladesh and restrict political rights and free speech in the country.
Mash says:

Apparently Mr. Khalil’s crime is that he did his job. He spoke truthfully about the current situation in Bangladesh. He was interviewed by Nora Boustany of the Washington Post last month - that interview may have cost him his freedom and now possibly his life.

I have been speaking out over the last month about the military takedown of the democratic system in Bangladesh. One by one the fundamental rights of Bangladeshis have been taken away. But, Bangladeshis have recently started to fight back against the military. The press, the people and the courts have begun speaking out. The military now aims to silence them. Their thuggery is now plain to see.

Other bloggers covering: Drishtipat, Global Voices, Rezwanul, Golmal Sid, Salam Dhaka, Keep me honest, My dear Bangladesh, Adda, Deshi Voice and Butterflies and Wheels.

Human Rights Watch has also issued a press release. SD says this has also been elevated to the US State dept and Washington Post should be doing a story.

We need to organise joint protests in Washington and London in front of the Bangladeshi embassies to raise the profile of this arrest and highlight human rights abuses there. “

Please check out the discussion on Pickled Politics ..where we”re figuring out what we can do. Any ideas are welcome and much appreciated.

The CNN story is here - I can”t find anything on the BBC”s site ..or Amnesty International - see that”s the problem with all these big institutions - they can”t move quickly! Hopefully the blogosphere will be quicker in spreading the news.

Bangladesh and Citizenship: Discrimination against women

16

More nation-state woes. Right: so discrimination against women is rampant in Bangladesh, as in other parts of the world. But I was really shocked when i found out recently about some pretty fundamental discrimination: citizenship laws and how they affect women. That seems to me rather critical. Okay so basically I”m a Bangladeshi citizen –> I hold a Bangladeshi passport. Now if a Bangladeshi man marries someone who isn”t a Bangladeshi citizen, fine no problemo mrs. x can become a bangladeshi citizen if she wants to, and basically has the ability to get a “Visa Exemption” stamp in her passport on proving that she”s married to some Bangladeshi bloke. Same with kids of aforementioned bangladeshi bloke - they”re entitled to nationality of their father - if they so choose - and if they don”t get themselves a Bangladeshi passport, they can still get themselves the “Visa Exemption” thingie in their (say) British passport.

Right : so what”s the problem here? Men are able to transmit their nationality - and effectively - rights to visiting their country - to their spouse and children. Fine. You wouldn”t expect any less. But is the same right extended to women? OH NO!

No it isn”t. If you are a Bangladeshi WOMAN married to some one who isn”t a BANGLADESHI citizen already - forget about the right to transmit your nationality along. You haven”t the right. TO your own children. If your child is born in Bangladesh - i guess that”s a different story. ( But i”m not sure of the detail - it generally seems to all rest upon who the father is. Such a paternalistic system)

But the fact remains, as a Bangladeshi citizen who lives somewhere else, if you”re a man, you can sort your wife and children out, but if you”re a woman, they don”t recognize your right to bring your children into the country, and your husband. they have to apply for visas like any tom dick and harry. so okay they might not mind, and as some folks have said, a bangladeshi passport isn”t something that everyone wants to have. Ha - you don”t say! :-) but that” ain”t the point. The point is that as a Bangladeshi woman, i am very annoyed with my government for thinking they can coolly make such statements and not piss me off. It”s my right to transmit my nationality to my child if i have one. Certainly, it”s discrimination in any case. I”m frightfully annoyed by this.

Patriarchy indeed.

Check out the guidelines for “Visa Exemption” published by the Bangladeshi High Commission, U.K. I have to do my research to check up what the actual laws surrounding citizenship are in Bangladesh - i”ve heard the mention of the Citizenship Act of 1951 back in the East Pakistani days - which may not have been amended since - who knows - either which way, watch this space for more information.

UPDATE:

The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (the CEDAW Convention) is a human rights treaty for women. The UN General Assembly adopted the CEDAW Convention on 19th December 1979. It came into force as a treaty on 3rd September 1981 -CEDAW is one of the most highly ratified international human rights conventions.

I’ve found a statement by one Hameeda Hossain, To the Committee on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women, On the Fifth Periodic Report of the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh at the 31st CEDAW Session, New York, in 2004 - as follows:

“..I would like to raise four critical areas of systemic discrimination against women:..”

And the second item on the list was:

” Citizenship Rights: Our second concern is that two outdated laws: The Bangladesh Citizenship Act, 1951 and The Bangladesh Citizenship (Temporary Provisions) Order 1972, deprive women of equal rights in citizenship. The prescription that the right of citizenship be passed on to children from “father and grandfather” is clearly inconsistent with constitutional guarantees of equality in Article 28(1 & 2). Although Article 6 of the Constitution states that citizenship will be determined and regulated by law, but its intention cannot be to create different classes of citizenship. These laws are also inconsistent with Bangladesh’s ratification of Article 9 of CEDAW. The government in its answer to question no 34 of the Committee has stated that the matter was discussed in the meeting of the National Council of Women in September 1992, but a decision was not taken. It is our submission that the amendment required is a minor one of language and not of principles or policy and the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs could, therefore, be tasked, to draft the amendments for adoption by Parliament, within a stated time period. We would further submit that both section 5 of the Bangladesh Citizenship Act 1951 and Bangladesh Citizenship Act (Temporary Provisions) Order of 1972 be amended to remedy discrimination with regard to citizenship.

Archives