Comments on: royal mail http://shorno.net/2006/04/05/royal-mail/ Journal : Critique & Commentary: On the Human Condition Fri, 18 May 2012 12:13:08 +0000 hourly 1 By: Bank CardUSA http://shorno.net/2006/04/05/royal-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-859792 Bank CardUSA Fri, 23 Mar 2012 02:10:03 +0000 http://shorno.net/2006/04/05/royal-mail/#comment-859792 Oooooh. headsweats *is* one of my running favorites. The only time I dont wear one is when its too cold and I need a warmer beanie. me, me, pick me! Oooooh. headsweats *is* one of my running favorites. The only time I dont wear one is when its too cold and I need a warmer beanie. me, me, pick me!

]]> By: sonia http://shorno.net/2006/04/05/royal-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4101 sonia Thu, 06 Apr 2006 10:57:43 +0000 http://shorno.net/2006/04/05/royal-mail/#comment-4101 the focus was supposed to be on 'accountability' if an organization has a public remit - it at least has to 'pretend' its remit is one of public service.if its private then it doesn't even have to pretend its out to provide a public service. whether an organization is efficient or not has nothing to do with whether its public or private - that much has been proved by the history of the world to date. Bureucracy, the mode of organization etc. these are the important factors. but of course that's not mainstream thinking. :-) the focus was supposed to be on ‘accountability’ if an organization has a public remit - it at least has to ‘pretend’ its remit is one of public service.if its private then it doesn’t even have to pretend its out to provide a public service.

whether an organization is efficient or not has nothing to do with whether its public or private - that much has been proved by the history of the world to date. Bureucracy, the mode of organization etc. these are the important factors. but of course that’s not mainstream thinking. :-)

]]> By: sonia http://shorno.net/2006/04/05/royal-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4097 sonia Thu, 06 Apr 2006 10:46:16 +0000 http://shorno.net/2006/04/05/royal-mail/#comment-4097 ha ha shows how much you know. royal mail plc may be wholly owned by the government, but fat lot of difference that makes. Probably won't be for much longer and im sure not much will change. after all the train services were privatized - ever read anything much about the British economy and privatization and all the rest of that>? doesn't sound like it? and its exactly the same if not worse. :-) ha ha shows how much you know. royal mail plc may be wholly owned by the government, but fat lot of difference that makes. Probably won’t be for much longer and im sure not much will change. after all the train services were privatized - ever read anything much about the British economy and privatization and all the rest of that>? doesn’t sound like it? and its exactly the same if not worse. :-)

]]> By: Voltaire http://shorno.net/2006/04/05/royal-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-4088 Voltaire Thu, 06 Apr 2006 04:21:12 +0000 http://shorno.net/2006/04/05/royal-mail/#comment-4088 Royal Mail is owned by the government and so it is but natural that its services should be shoody, as shoddy as that of Royal family. Only way out is to privatize all the services and do away with the royality. Why should people be encumbered with a Prince C! Sack him I say, and sack all the royal appendages like the Royal Mail et al as well. But comrade Sonia would never want it to be that way. So let her suffer the lousy mail service. Royal Mail is owned by the government and so it is but natural that its services should be shoody, as shoddy as that of Royal family.

Only way out is to privatize all the services and do away with the royality. Why should people be encumbered with a Prince C! Sack him I say, and sack all the royal appendages like the Royal Mail et al as well.

But comrade Sonia would never want it to be that way. So let her suffer the lousy mail service.

]]>