Paris Riots..

November 4, 2005 – 2:24 pm

goodness the paris riots have been carrying on for the last week, more violence is erupting, and now apparently there have been riots across the country. oh dear. such places highlighted in news reports include Dijon, Rouen, and around Marseille.

the bbc news articles indicate that the unrest was sparked by the ‘deaths of two teenagers of African origin’.

clearly there is a lot of trouble afoot, needless to say. the indication from news sources is that a lot of the rioters are ‘North African Muslims’ , ‘locally-born French citizens’ “who feel that poverty, sub-standard housing, high unemployment and discrimination give the lie to France’s Republican principles of liberty, equality and fraternity”. Apparently the police “hurled a tear gas canister - some believe deliberately - into the Bilal mosque in the Paris suburb of Clichy, on Sunday evening” ..and this has added to the already bubbling mix.

{ i say apparently - frankly since i’m not there and you can’t ever trust what the media says really - and especially in violent situations no-one really knows what’s been going on and who’s doing what so i keep an open mind. }

the fact that it’s eid hasn’t managed to put a stopper to the violence.

but anyway, of course there’s a big fuss from all sides. Sigh. Le Figaro newspaper quoted right-wing former interior minister Charles Pasqua as asking Chirac “to account to the nation,” and France’s anti-immigrant National Front leader, Monsieur Jean-Marie Le Pen, said “France is under attack from hordes of foreigners”.

so some things don’t change. the simmering pot explodes and everyone will blame everybody else. very sad. the right-wing anti-immigration crew who think of ‘assimilation’ as a perfectly normal concept - and then there people who think that they are being ‘othered’ -and then other people in the middle..

Sounds to me pretty similar to most of the trouble in history: You - you’re different. you must be more like us. oh im different? really? [well i shall be different then] well if you’re different, you’re not one of us . You must be like one of us. and it goes on and on and then what a surprise - someone kills someone else. Oh i said they were trouble didnt i? We must kill ‘them’. oh yes - you kill us - you are against ‘us’ . [ fine we may put up with it now - but then maybe we’ll go somewhere else and repeat the aggression ..and pass it along]

any of this sound familiar to anyone?

  1. 11 Responses to “Paris Riots..”

  2. ‘Superiority’ and ‘egoistic’ émotion in dominant individual/s or group/s of people known to be a kind of ‘morals dieses’ have a history back to for as long as human existent on this planet. Strength, wealth, skin colours, origin, status and alike are ‘virus/s that credited/play an important part of cause/s in developing such ‘ill feeling’ developed a tendency to execute/s discrimination and oppression on a ‘weaker’ one.
    *
    This happen to be not only between two separate group of people from two different root of ‘origin’ or race, but also within the same circle of its own race and in fact inside the very same family. Its not surprise when it happen between two different group which have a long history of distrust, that indeed the case would deepen.
    *
    Consequences (magnitude) sometimes unimaginable, because ‘cancer type’ ‘morals dieses’ is not something easy to be cured and ‘reason/s’ for a back lashed here therefore is only an ‘excuse/s’ and it can be any, since its just a matter of time for such a thing that occurred in France could happen, anywhere and anytime.

    By Cimurai on Nov 6, 2005

  3. I never really understood this directly until I lived in rural Japan.

    First I behaved like a respectful guest, but continued to do my own thing where I didn’t think it would cause disrespect to the community in which I was a guest.

    Then I gradually found out that my foreign behaviour was still causing upset.

    So I tried harder to fit in. Even when it caused me some - or great - inconvenience to do so.

    Gradually, I realised that no matter how much tried to fit in, I would never be treated equally, even by relative moderates, who could not get past the fact that I was foreign and therefore different.

    At the same time, demands continued that I should behave as if I had been brought up in Japan. (ie. work two hours overtime for no pay on a daily basis, purely for the sake of impressions, not leave the town to travel Japan when it was vacation time, to take paid holiday leave when I was ill instead of sick leave, not take Japanese girlfriends back to my house for goodness sake).

    Eventually, I concluded - entirely rationally - that if I were still to be segregated and treated differently whatever I did because I was a foreigner, there was really no point in acceding to these inconvenient and annoying cultural demands.

    So I went back to my own behavioural norms. There was simply no acceptance to be gained by “turning Japanese”.

    The people in the town who resented me continued to curse and spread slanderous rumours about me - some of which I heard! - but life actually became easier and more comfortable once I stopped trying to win the approval of the xenophobic community I was living in.

    Having demands on you to “behave the same” while consistently being treated differently is intolerable.

    By Ibn-Battuta on Nov 6, 2005

  4. yeah conformity sucks. and as C up there points out it doesnt have to be within groups that consider themselves different in terms of race/whatever. the point is rather an inverse one - that once you’ve decided to ‘other’ someone else - you can put it down to some biological or social distinction. Usually the biological thing tends to work better with humans - they really go for the biological determinism thing as we can see.

    By sonia on Nov 6, 2005

  5. Sorry mam, but i must disagree with you on your views on Paris riots. (heh, heh, see I can laugh too). But when I am serious I can throw some amazing perspectives. Look for factual views on Paris riots on my blog.

    By IC on Nov 7, 2005

  6. Terribly amusing. please everyone go have a look at indian capitalists blog..

    By sonia on Nov 7, 2005

  7. is IC is right in ‘blaming the French’ for their current problem ? i suppose he means that if you encourage people to think they ought to have rights as an individual, not as a representative of some group - ( e.g. in the old days pre-revolution, you were either a noble or a peasant) - but individuals who have equal rights, and liberty, then later you can’t blame them for having ideas and kicking up a fuss.

    ( well he says they ‘deserve their just desserts’ ( ooh that sounds rather like he’s going to get branded as an ‘islamic terrorist’ for saying that ! hee hee- they won’t know the difference will they? after all surely all brown people are the same, non?)

    well that sounds a bit unpleasant to me. i think obviously people have to have rights and need to stand up and speak out for those rights. i am not going to go into detail as obviously i dont know the situation in this case, but speaking out for rights doesn’t need to be done in a violent way. i think we all would want a world where people can speak up for themselves without having to resort to violence.

    peace and flowers to everyone. ( there - is that a nice feminine touch?)

    By sonia on Nov 7, 2005

  8. Sonia,

    IC is right in some ways. The problem of the French is their innate desire that the state has to do something about an individuals misery. In America it is distinctly different, and I have personally felt it. Here it is a desire of an INDIVIDUAL to contribute to the state. Note the shift in the “weltenshaung”. Not that everybody in France needs SECURITY from the state but most do. Similarly not everybody in America feels the need to contribute to the state but most would gladly do.

    The manifestations of such a philosophy in France are - Strikes - Strikes at the drop of a hat. Unwillingness to work even one extra day for the old. A country of unemployment where the governments responsibility is to take care of the unemployed. 35 hour weeks - 4 days of work and 3 days of vacation in southern France. Riots in France regarding religion.

    The manifestation of the philosophy in America- Higest labor productivity in the world. Long work hours. Problem of running out of pension- marginal. One of the lowest unemplyment amongst the major industrial economies of the world. Strikes literally unheard of. And also note all this is not at the expense of the individual. America still has the highest spending on health care on per capita basis amongst all the industrial nations including France.

    By ven on Nov 7, 2005

  9. splutter, choke laugh.

    yeah of course strikes are unheard of - everyone’s too busy working. why arent you Ven? aren’t you supposed to be some super-hot ‘NRI’ fancy career type?

    By sonia on Nov 7, 2005

  10. and thanks - we all know about health insurance in the states, buddy. there is no such thing as ‘free’ healthcare.

    By sonia on Nov 7, 2005

  11. Yep, I am a super hot NRI type. And the country that made it possible to live my dream is this good old US of A. So you will have noticed that immigrants dont have problems here in US and may I rub it in - UNLIKE IN FRANCE.

    To illuminate you about the health care here in US and in Europe why dont you follow the link below:
    http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?hint=3&DR_ID=31329

    You know it is very easy to be deceived by leftist dictators of Hugo Chavez type. For his idealogy is very enticing to the baser instincts of human mind to be taken care of. It is far more harder to dig the facts and know the TRUTH.

    By ven on Nov 7, 2005

  12. Paris riots coming to America. . . What is the plight of America’s black males? Consider the following.

    I write the following because Tom Birdsong, Assistant Managing Editor, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, on Wednesday, November 9, 2005, said, “No one is going to write about your family’s plight.” Thereafter, Mrs. Estelle B. Richman’s staff (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania‘s Secretary of Welfare) became very rude and indifferent to our emergency situation. In fact, Ms. Richman’s chief of staff, Linda Hicks no longer accepted our calls. Christian Bowser actually laughed about our situation. Inez Titus, became even more stubborn with her unlawful position. The Executive Director for Western Pennsylvania Department of Welfare, Tim Cornell (Mrs. Titus’ supervisor) has yet to return any of our calls.

    Nonetheless, a man was shot to death in a cinema lobby shootout after watching gangsta rapper 50 cent’s movie “Get Rich or Die Tryin’,” prompting the Loews Cineplex at the Waterfront in West Homestead (just east of Pittsburgh) to stop showing the film. I was there with my family (common-law wife and three minor children). That is, although determined eligible, my family has again been denied the Low Income Heating Assistance Program (“LIHEAP”) federal entitlement for the fourth or fifth straight year. Without heat during the cold winter months a theater provides temporary shelter (allowing my family opportunity to give relatives “a break” from our nightly sleep-overs).

    What happened at the Waterfront? Shelton Flowers, 30, of Wilkinsburg, Pennsylvania, was shot three times and died later at a local hospital. Flowers had just watched the movie and got into a confrontation with three men in the bathroom. A fight ensued and spilled out into the concessions area, where Flowers was shot. Immediately, Loews Cineplex pulled the movie as a precaution. The R-rated movie is based on Curtis “50-cent” Jackson’s own life which includes drug dealing, time in prison, and getting shot nine times. Paramount Pictures, a unit of Viacom, Inc., removed billboards for the movie near some inner-city schools after Los Angeles area community leaders complained last month.

    Wilkinsburg, just east of Pittsburgh, is a town that was once synonymous with white supremacy. It is a town that had a mere 502 black residents in 1950 when its population hit 31,000, and only 224 more black residents 10 years later. But, over the next few decades, almost like a prophecy, the black population rose to 90 percent. That is, just a little more than 200 years ago Andrew Levi Levy, Sr. named the town “Africa.”

    The borough grew from Levy’s land and other plots (such as the curiously named “Pious Purchase,” and others called Rippeyville, McNairsville and Sterrett Township). It was incorporated some 118 years ago and given the name Wilkinsburg after Judge William Wilkins, the Secretary of War under President John Tyler. Nonetheless, many of its current residents still believe Wilkinsburg is no different today than it was in the 1920’s when hooded knights of the Ku Klux Klan cavorted. They say whites still control the town with black “puppets” politicians.

    While other cities the size of Pittsburgh has seen a steady growth in gun crime, our gun violence trajectory appears to have exploded. Community activists, politicians and crime experts all have brainstorm strategies for stemming violence. The residents here had hoped for a comprehensive plan of action that would have addressed part of the root causes that lead our neighbors to take up guns. But, the answer given is more of the same. The local politicians have taken a page from the George W. Bush handbook (Madison Avenue to sell our reputation).

    We have our three rivers, a beautiful skyline, a romantic culture district, a few of the country’s best hospitals, excellent universities, and the like. But, there’s never anything mentioned about our blighted downtown business district, the high unemployment rate of black males, increased gun violence, and the growth of conservative republican complacency.

    It’s no secret any more that economic conditions for blacks in Pittsburgh and its surrounding communities is precarious. Black residents rank low compared to the national average of income, employment, and education. We have chronic problems of gang and drug violence, family breakdowns, soaring incarceration rates for young black males, and abysmally failing public schools. Wilkinsburg residents are, in fact, the best example of the 13 percent of the United States’ (black) population still living chained in by a Bush presidency, with our eyes riveted on the wall of the white media (Madison Avenue) in front of us, where we see nothing but shadows made by powerless leaders hiding behind us.

    We could debate endlessly the role of such squeamishness in concealing and exacerbating the problem with race relations in both Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania. We could also discuss the minor role played by gangsta rap music. But, what we should consider is how right-wing conservatives, such as Senator Rick Santorum, have convinced so many blacks that shadows from behind (self-indulgent grab for expensive cars, clothes and money of black republican conservatives living in our affluent North Hills neighborhoods) are reality.

    Many of the black residents of Pittsburgh and the surrounding communities believe a lot of the Madison Avenue nonsense. They believe things that are just not true. And, the Republicans gets their strength from this.

    The bottom line: The root cause of the shooting at the Loews Cineplex is the apparent political cleansing of true democrats from local politics. Gerrymandering and electoral manipulation (just plan “punk ass” democrats) have left the city with zones of endemic poverty, an absence of social services, crumbling infrastructure, and appalling schools. After the radicalized poverty of black America was laid bare in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina almost everyone expected some change from white America. But quickly the Bush administration and the Republican party have lapsed back into policies to further divide America.

    In the 1990’s white America built prisons to house the disproportionately black inmates it had planned to toss into jail (in the years that followed) to reassure the affluent majority it complacency with race issues. One of every eight black males between 25 and 29 years old is behind bars on any given day according to the Sentencing Project, a nonprofit group that seeks to reduce incarceration rates. If this rate continues, one of three black males born today will be imprisoned at some point in their lifetimes.

    A local daily “conservative right” newspaper, “The Pittsburgh Tribune Review” recently feature an article written by Walter Williams, a professor of economics at George Mason University. In the article “Ammunition for Poverty Pimps” Mr. William suggested the Census Bureau’s 2004 current Population Survey found two segments of the black community. One segment suffers only 9.9 percent poverty rate and another suffers 39.5. He surmised that one would be a lunatic if they believed white people practice discrimination. He concluded, among other things, that the only distinction between the two segments was marriage. Adding, “If today’s black family structure were what it was in 1960, the overall black poverty rate would be in or near single digits.”

    I guess Mr. Williams failed to consider the proof that demonstrates blacks are denied opportunities in forms of employment, education and even human treatment. For example, on October 18, I borrowed a little more than $50 to buy a bus ticket to travel halfway across the state for an oral test given by the Pennsylvania Civil Service Commission. I was well dressed in a dark business suit and could have been easily mistaken as a black republican conservative. However, while on the elevator headed for the floor for the testing, a white woman asked me if I was allowed on the floor where the testing was being held. She suggested that because I was black, “I had no business on their elevator.” She ordered me off the elevator on a lower floor and said that she would have to call up stairs to let the staff know I was on my way.

    Soon thereafter she was advised that I was scheduled for an oral test on the floor I was trying to get to. But, she still refused to compromise. She announced that I wasn’t permitted to travel through their office without an escort. Interestingly, it was additionally odd that the State required a monitor to sit in with me during my testing.

    Nonetheless, getting back to the LIHEAP issue, the federal entitlement program provides waivers and reduced heating rates to low-income households. It is a federal program that assists those who cannot pay their bills. Eligible households can receive assistance through a direct payment to energy vendors that supply their fuel, or through a crisis component during weather-related emergencies. To be eligible for the program, household income cannot exceed 135 percent of the federal poverty income guidelines: $12,920 for a one-person household; $17,321 for two persons; $21,722 for three persons; $26,123 for four persons; $30,524 for five persons. For larger households, the guidelines increase by $4,401 for each additional person. Homeowners, renters (including those whose rent includes heat), roomers and subsidized housing tenants may be eligible.

    I have a good understanding of the program because I was previously employed by Allegheny County as a planner and wrote grant applications for the agency that implements the program. However, in 1989, I was fired in retaliation for organizing a union. The political sub-division said I was terminated for being tardy four times in a four-month period. The Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (”PHRC”)identified a white female working in the same office as having been tardy 71 times during the same time period and not disciplined. But, the PHRC ruled it was bad management and not discrimination.

    Ever since my termination the political-subdivision has found some way to retaliate against my household, i.e., always reaches from any available loophole to frustrate the process and deny my family the federal entitlement. In the past, I have complained to the State, federal government (FBI), courts and media to no avail.

    Consider this, when the aftermath of Hurricane Ivan passed through Western Pennsylvania in September 2004, the LIHEAP offered free water heaters and furnaces. Income restrictions were waived allowing the affluent to participate. My family was denied relief because the deed to our house is recorded in our minor son’s name. But, LIHEAP allows renters and other non-homeowners to participate.

    The current issue involves Duquense Light Company’s termination of our electric service immediately following the close of last year’s LIHEAP program (March 31, 2005). Although they already had $371 as a security deposit the utility company terminated service and demanded $866.01. And, despite the fact that we didn’t have any electrical service, the next month we received an unexplained bill for almost twice the amount actually due: $1,646.17. Because we are current living on “food stamps” we were forced to go without electric until the start of the 2005-2006 LIHEAP program.

    As a “food stamp” participant we received our LIHEAP application early and returned it weeks before the November 7 start. In fact, as we do each year, we contacted Mr. Cornell’s office to advise him of our situation (requested that he process our application to allow the electrical service to be restored on November 7 without a 72-hour wait). Mr. Cornell didn’t respond.

    Mrs. Titus, Mr. Cornell’s assistant did call on November 7, just before the closing (3:00 p.m.) of her office. She advised our application would be denied - “Duquense Light now demanded $2,600.” To memorialize the outrageous response I requested permission from Mrs. Titus to allow a “three-way” connection with the local media Channel 4). I called Channel 4 because I was given its “gold medal” for outstanding community service in 1989. However, during the three-way conversation Ms. Titus refused to acknowledge her previous position (Duquense Light demand of $2,600). She would only say our family was being denied the federal entitlement. Immediately, I voiced a complaint to Mr. Cornell’s secretary. She suggested that I call Harrisburg (Department of Welfare’s main office). She provided me the number.

    Precious Perry answered the Secretary of Welfare’s telephone. She transferred me to Ms. Richman’s chief of staff (Linda Hicks). Mrs. Hicks promised to have Christian Bowser call before five p.m.. But, it never happened. At 9:00 a.m. the next morning (November 8), I called Mr. Cornell’s office and left another message requesting a return call. I also called Mrs. Hicks again and questioned why Mrs. Bowser never called.

    This time, Mrs. Hicks promised to have Ms. Bowser call before 11 a.m.. Mrs. Hicks asked us to “call back if Mrs. Bowser failed to call.” It never happened.

    I did call Ms. Hicks at 12:00 noon but she rushed me off the phone. She gave me Mrs. Bowser’s telephone number and requested that I call her directly. I called the number but got Mrs. Bowser’s voice mail. I left a message explaining the situation. Mrs. Bowser never called back.

    On November 9, 2005, I called Mrs. Hicks again to advise Mrs. Bowser’ failure to call. But, Mrs. Hicks quickly rushed me off the phone again. She said that she would no longer address the issue. She said “communicate with Ms. Bowser from that point.”

    Thereafter, I called Mrs. Bowser’s and spoke with her secretary. I left another message. Even more frustrated now, I called the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. I spoke with Mr. Tom Birdsong. I advised him of our situation and asked if he would investigate the issue in a “confidential” manner. He said that he would forward the information to Larry Walsh. I informed him that in the previous years I have communicated with Mr. Walsh but nothing was done. I even told Mr. Birdsong that I once connected a Post-Gazette columnist, Tony Norman, and allowed him to participated with a three-way telephone call (allowed him opportunity to monitor a call to prove how rude the LIHEAP program staff was acting). Mr. Birdsong said he would have Mr. Walsh call.

    At approximately 4:00 p.m., I was finally able to get Mrs. Bowser on the telephone. She laughed at our situation!

    After laughing, Mrs. Bowser would only reiterated Mrs. Titus position, “Duquense Light can demand funds that are not owed.” She added, “Mrs. Titus’ position is final.” She said she would have Mrs. Titus send us a rejection letter.

    Immediately, I called Mr. Birdsong. But, he became rude. The conversation concluded with Mr. Birdsong saying “No one is going to write about your family’s plight.”

    50 cents, during an interview on ABC’s “The View,” said he was saddened by the fatal shooting: “I feel for the victim’s family in this situation.” He added, “But you know, these weren’t kids. This was a 30-year-old man (who) had a dispute with three other guys.”

    I’m older than 30. But, what is rage? How come I’m able to control my anger? Would I have controlled my anger if one of my family members was hit by a stray bullet during the shootout?

    http://www.kstreetfriend.blogspot.com

    By http://www.kstreetfriend.blogspot.com on Nov 16, 2005

Post a Comment